Welcome to Classifications and Online Calculators in Radiology

This site was build along with the Atlas of Radiology Images to support your knowledge in radiology.

You will find here:

that are used in radiology and related fields with free access.

Moreover:

  • Some pages are accompanied by illustrations
  • All pages contain tags for easy navigation
 

The concept

The concept of this website is based on a previous site that was founded in 2008 and is still up and running. The website is composed as a book, where all sources are properly referenced, according to a good practice in scientific publications.

Didn't find a classification?

 

    Featured page

    Chondromalacia - MRI grading by modified Noyes System

    The modified Noyes system was published in 2009. It is a modification of the Noyes grading system for the purpose of MRI grading. The original Noyes grading system was based on arthroscopic findings.

    Grade Description
    Grade 0 normal cartilage
    Grade 1 increased T2 signal intensity of morphologically normal cartilage not oriented at 55° to the external magnetic field
    Grade 2A superficial partial-thickness cartilage defect <50% of total articular surface thickness
    Grade 2B deep partial-thickness cartilage defect >50% of total articular surface thickness
    Grade 3 full-thickness cartilage defect

    References:

    1. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, Smet AAD. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluating the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint1. Radiology. 2009 Mar 1;250(3):839–48.
    2. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, et al. Articular Cartilage in the Knee: Current MR Imaging Techniques and Applications in Clinical Practice and Research. Radiographics. 2011 Jan 1;31(1):37–61.
    3. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, Kesling KL, Christensen KP, Null RN, et al. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Sep;163(3):629–36.

    See the page
    Syndicate content